Home Hi tech computer
music software and hardware reviews, practical hands-on tutorials,
music-making hints and tips, written by professional
musicians, seasoned computer users and professional
writers
|
Stay informed with the
Making Music Newsletter and get a FREE copy of Creating The
Perfect Mix.
We hate spam as much as you do and we promise never
ever to sell, rent, loan or give away your personal
information. We fully conform to the USA CAN-SPAM rules. Here's
our privacy policy. |
We explain what each product is, what it does, how it works, what
the system requirements are, how it performs in use, and sum up our
findings in fast summary charts.
The reviews are divided into Software and Hardware - see a full list on the
Site Map.
How we score
In truth, very little music software released by the major music
software developers is poor and a lot of it is cracking good gear.
The main questions most users need to ask are: how well does it do
what it says on the tin, how easy is it to use, how much does it
cost (unless you're starting your third World Tour), and does it do
what I need?
We can help with the first three - only you can decide if it
does what you want - but, inevitably, they are all intertwined. If
a product only does a couple of the things you need but it's cheap,
it could be a worthwhile buy just to get a couple of features.
A problem many people have with much music software is that it's
often seen to be expensive. However, music software is among the
most complex and demanding to create and much of it is quite
specialised with a relatively small market. Compared to the price
to mass market software, music software is generally not
unreasonably priced. But if we think it is, we'll say so.
Ease-of-use is another major factor. It's probably taken you a
few weeks to master your main music production software so you
don't want to spend any longer than necessary getting to grips with
a new program. After you've played with a few bits of software for
a while, you get a feel for it and you have an expectation that
other software of a similar kind will work in a similar way.
For example, Windows' Open and Save File dialog boxes are
familiar to all computer users (okay, except Mac users but the Mac
also has its standard dialog boxes, too) and the standard system of
menus - File, Edit, View and so on - along the top of an
application window is also familiar. Some software has its own file
handling dialogs and its own menu system. If this offers major
benefits over the normal layout with regard to the program and if
it's easy to understand then we accept it's been done for good
reason.
But sometimes software has non-standard features with no
advantages in which case we may refer to the non-standard or
idiosyncratic interface. This doesn't mean that the software is not
good, just that the learning curve may be a little longer and
without major benefit for the user.
Our scoring system brings together all these aspects of the
product for easy and fast reference but you will want to read the
main text, too.
|